|
2009/10 PSSap performance
| PSSap investment
option |
1
year |
5 years
annualised |
| Trustee choice |
8.9% |
4.1% |
| Conservative |
8.3% |
4.2% |
| Balanced |
9.0% |
|
| Aggressive |
11.0% |
4.0% |
| Cash |
3.4% |
4.7% |
| Government bonds |
7.5% |
2.6% |
| Australian shares |
13.1% |
4.9% |
| International shares (unhedged) |
6.7% |
-0.6% |
| International shares (hedged) |
11.1% |
-0.5% |
| Property |
1.6% |
8.3% |
| Sustainable |
11.3% |
3.6% |
Remember
past performance is no indication of future performance.
Over
the financial year to 30 June 2010, the PSSap default option
(Trustee choice) rose by 8.9%. This reflected a robust bounce back
in domestic and international equity market prices as well as strong
outperformance of the index benchmarks by our active managers in
Australian shares, International shares, investment-grade credit,
hedge funds and our high-quality core unlisted property
portfolio.
The
Australian shares option achieved the highest return in the
financial year to 30 June 2010, while double digit performance was
also recorded by the Sustainable, International shares (hedged) and
Aggressive options. Despite challenging market conditions, our
property portfolio has performed very well, both in absolute and
relative terms, because of our high-quality core property holdings.
Since
its inception in July 2005, the Trustee choice option has returned
4.1% per annum. This performance is below our long term expectations
but places the PSSap's performance well above the median super fund
across all time periods (see the chart
below).
How
we stack up
The PSSap Trustee choice option performed
better than the median super fund (based on SuperRatings performance
data) in both the last three years and since its inception in July
2005. This is highlighted in the following chart.
PSSap's
comparison to SuperRatings all-fund median 
The
rate of return is annualised, both for the three years ending
May 2010 and also from PSSap's inception in 2005 to May 2010.
Market
report for 2009/10
The aftermath of the global debt crisis
has involved a transfer of debt from the private sector (households
and the financial sector) to the balance sheets of many
developed-world governments. This has resulted in a differentiation
between those countries able to service that debt (for example core
Europe and the US) and those less able (for example peripheral
European countries, such as Greece). It has also reinforced the
increasing dependence of global growth on the emerging regions, most
prominently China.
Financial
markets rebounded in the first nine months of the 2009/10 financial
year, as policy initiatives stabilised global economic growth and
the financial system, which reduced the risk of depression. Over the
financial year to 30 June 2010, the Australian listed equity market
rose around 13.1%, after its 20% decline in 2008/09. Global
equity markets rose by 11.5% (compared to the previous year, when
they fell by a little more than our domestic index).
However,
a rise in the value of the Australian dollar eroded some of these
offshore gains for investors who did not hedge their foreign
currency exposure. Commodity markets also performed strongly over
the period, achieving double-digit returns. Metals rose by around
20%, with copper prices rising by almost 30%. The price of gold rose
by 35%, as it is generally perceived to be a hedge against deflation
risk and/or a collapse in fiat currencies. Oil prices, by
comparison, increased by a more modest 8%.
A
lack of global inflationary pressures and stimulatory monetary
policy created a generally favourable environment for government
bonds. The Australian dollar moved broadly in line with the equity
markets, rising in the first nine months of the year before
declining in the June quarter. For the year as a whole, the
Australian Dollar rose by 20% against a weak Euro and 5% against a
stronger US dollar.
The
volatility of financial market price movements remains elevated,
reflecting a generally higher level of uncertainty about the
outlook. Investors remain sensitive to economic growth news, which
is unusually dependent on the success of policy and the
less-transparent emerging economies. They are also responsive to any
news that indicates the potential impact of structural factors (for
example sovereign debt burdens) on the inflation
outlook. |